Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 140-144.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2015.02.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

RNA恒温扩增实时荧光检测技术检测支气管肺泡灌洗液对涂阴肺结核的快速诊断价值

范琳 王鹏 杨妍 马俊 葛燕萍 卫卫 崔振玲   

  1. 200433 同济大学附属上海市肺科医院结核病临床诊疗中心 上海市结核病(肺)重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-18 出版日期:2015-02-10 发布日期:2015-03-21
  • 通信作者: 范琳 E-mail:fanlinsj@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    上海市卫生局科研课题计划任务(20124183)

Fast diagnostic value of SAT-TB for smear-negative pulmonary tuberuclosis using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

FAN Lin, WANG Peng, YANG Yan, MA Jun, GE Yan-ping, WEI Wei, CUI Zhen-ling   

  1. Clinic and Research Center of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Key of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2014-10-18 Online:2015-02-10 Published:2015-03-21
  • Contact: FAN Lin E-mail:fanlinsj@163.com

摘要: 目的 研究结核分枝杆菌RNA恒温扩增实时荧光检测技术(simultaneous amplification and testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis,SAT-TB)检测支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)对涂阴肺结核的诊断价值。 方法 对2012年6月至2014年6月收治的同济大学附属上海市肺科医院结核科的252例疑似肺结核患者进行筛查,痰涂片连续3次阴性者进入研究,行支气管镜检查,收集BALF,行结核分枝杆菌快速培养(Bactec MGIT 960)及SAT-TB检测,同时进行诊断。所有患者随访至少6个月,记录入选者的最后诊断、影像学特征、痰培养结果等所有相关信息。以培养法作为诊断的参考标准,计算SAT-TB诊断涂阴肺结核的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值。 结果 共有234例涂阴疑似肺结核患者进入最后分析,其中58例培养阳性,112例为培养阴性经过临床诊断的肺结核患者,64例为非肺结核患者。以培养法为计算阳性标准,SAT-TB检测BALF诊断涂阴肺结核的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为81.0%(47/58,95%CI:69.0%~90.1%)、96.9%(62/64,95%CI:88.9%~100.0%)、95.9%(47/49,95%CI:86.4%~100.0%)及84.9%(62/73,95%CI:75.3%~92.2%)。SAT-TB的检测时间约2 h,快于培养法的31 d。 结论 SAT-TB可通过检测BALF为涂阴肺结核患者提供快速、可靠的诊断依据,是一项有价值的诊断方法。

关键词: 结核, 肺/诊断, 支气管肺泡灌洗液, 核酸扩增技术

Abstract: Objective To study the diagnostic value of SAT-TB(simultaneous amplification and testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis) for smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis(PTB) by testing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BLAF). Methods From June 2012 to June 2014 in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Tongji University, we screened 252 suspected PTB patients with 3 consecutive negative sputum smears, and obtained their BLAF specimen by brochchoscopy. BALF was tested by both Bactec MGIT 960 culture and SAT-TB assay. We diagnosed all patients, followed up for at least 6 months and collected associated information of patients regarding final diagnosis, culture results, imaging changes. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for each diagnostic test were calculated using culture results as reference standard.  Results Of 234 PTB suspects included in the final analysis, 58 were TB culture positive, 112 were PTB patients by clinical diagnosis with culture negative, 64 were non-TB patients. Using culture confirmed results as reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of SAT-TB for smear-negative PTB testing BALF were 81.0%(47/58, 95%CI:69.0%-90.1%), 96.9%(62/64,95%CI:88.9%-100.0%), 95.9% (47/49,95%CI:86.4%-100.0%) and 84.9%(62/73, 95%CI:75.3%-92.2%). The detection time of SAT-TB was around two hours, remarkably shorter than 31 days needed by culture.  Conclusion SAT-TB can provide reliable, fast diagnostic evidence for smear- negative PTB and is a valuable diagnostic method.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary/diagnosis, Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, Nucleic acid amplification sechniques